« Germany: High-level Politician Criticizes Islamic Violence |
| UK: Muslim Extremist Becomes Schools Inspector »
September 30, 2006
Norway: Muslim Hijacker Who Bragged Of "Mujahideen" Status Now Faces Drugs Charges
An Iranian Muslim who hijacked a plane in 1993 has now, according to Aftenposten and Nettavisen been arrested on drug smuggling charges. 33-year old Fahrad Mohammed Injeh (pictured) has frequently made headlines in Norway since the time that he and two others boarded a plane in Baku, Azerbaijan.
The other hijackers included his brother, and they used the threat of waving live hand grenades at staff to be allowed into the cockpit of the Aeroflot plane. They ordered the pilot to fly to Norway, with a brief refueling stop in Kiev. Once in Norway, Injeh, his brother Mansour and their accomplice were kept in a detention center for two years. They were extradited to Russia, and there served a short prison sentence until 1997.
After the prison sentence, they made their way to Denmark, where they were kept in a refugee center at Fyn. Here the two brothers acted like gangsters. One refugee there said to Ekstrabladet, a Danish newspaper: "Farhad and Mansour bragged all the time that they belonged to the Mujahedin in Iran, and they acted like kings in the camp." The two brothers regularly beat up other refugees in the Flyn center, where "it was Mansour who made the plans, and Farhad who carried them out." The pair were refused asylum in Denmark, so they arrived back in Norway.
In June 2002 the brothers were granted asylum and rights of residence in Norway, a decision which shocked the public, and drew condemnation from some ministers. The issue became more scandalous when it was revealed, just after asylum was granted, that the brothers were in no danger of being executed in their native Iran, where they should have been returned.
Norway is not a member of the European Union, and therefore is not subject to the ECHR, the European Convention of Human Rights. Article 3 of this convention states that "no-one can be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment". A similar case of hijackers being granted asylum happened in Britain, where it was argued that nine Afghans could not be returned to their native country, in case they received harsh punishment.
Even though Norway is not subject to the terms of the ECHR, it nonetheless has a policy which prevents individuals being returned to their countries if there is a risk of them being executed. This principle has so far prevented the terrorist Mullah Krekar from being returned to his native Iraq. Krekar has resided in Norway for 14 years as a result of this. Nonetheless, he still went back to Iraq, where he set up the terrorist organisation Ansar al-Islam fi Kurdistan or "Supporters of Islam in Kurdistan" in 2001. Krekar still lives as a free man in Norway, threatening violent reprisals if he does not get his way.
Days after the Iranian brothers had been granted asylum in Norway, it was revealed by the Norwegian embassy in Iran that embassy officials and the Iranian authorities had assured the Directorate of Immigration (UDI) that, if the Injeh brothers were returned to Iran, they would be in no danger of receiving death sentences. The Iranian authorities claimed that no person in Iran would receive any punishment for crimes committed abroad, if they had already served a sentence.
In the fall of last year, Fahrad Mohammed Injeh was arrested in a drugs case, which was dropped for lack of evidence. His latest brush with the law concerns a plan to smuggle amphetamines from Sweden into Norway. It was reported on Friday that police had been trailing drug couriers from Svunesund on the Swedish border to a garage in As, which was then raided. Five men were arrested, including Fahrad Mohammed Injeh.
Injeh was one of two men who were believed to have received the drugs. Two others had driven the vehicle, which was found to contain more than five kilograms of the drugs. The other man owned the garage.
Injeh's lawyer said that his client was "baffled" by the charges. Petter Sørensen said: "This is probably a case of being in the wrong place at the wrong time."
Just like those people terrorized on the Aeroflot plane, or those beaten up by Injeh and his brother Mansour in Fyn refugee center, who also happened to be in "the wrong place at the wrong time."
Posted by Giraldus Cambrensis at September 30, 2006 3:42 PM
Comments
Norway is not a member of the European Union, and therefore is not subject to the ECHR, the European Convention of Human Rights.
Bullsh*t !
The ECHR has NOTHING to do with the European Union but everything to do with The Council of Europe set up in 1949............even Russia is a member. Norway was a Founder Member on 5 May 1949
Take a look at the membership:
http://www.coe.int/
http://www.coe.int/t/cm/prs_EN.asp
Norway
Mr Torbjørn Frøysnes, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary
* Belgium
* Flag of Denmark Denmark
* Flag of France France
* Flag of Republic of Ireland Ireland
* Flag of Italy Italy
* Flag of Luxembourg Luxembourg
* Flag of Netherlands Netherlands
* Flag of Norway Norway
* Flag of Sweden Sweden
* Flag of United Kingdom United Kingdom
Members with later admission dates (sorted by date of admission):
* Flag of Greece Greece (9 August 1949)
* Flag of Turkey Turkey (9 August 1949)
* Flag of Iceland Iceland (9 March 1950)
* Flag of Germany Germany Federal Republic of Germany (13 July 1950)
* Flag of Austria Austria (16 April 1956)
* Flag of Cyprus Cyprus (24 May 1961)
* Flag of Switzerland Switzerland (6 May 1963)
* Flag of Malta Malta (29 April 1965)
* Flag of Portugal Portugal (22 September 1976)
* Flag of Spain Spain (24 November 1977)
* Flag of Liechtenstein Liechtenstein (23 November 1978)
* Flag of San Marino San Marino (16 November 1988)
* Flag of Finland Finland (5 May 1989)
* Flag of Hungary Hungary (6 November 1990)
* Flag of Poland Poland (26 November 1991)
* Flag of Bulgaria Bulgaria (7 May 1992)
* Flag of Estonia Estonia (14 May 1993)
* Flag of Lithuania Lithuania (14 May 1993)
* Flag of Slovenia Slovenia (14 May 1993)
* Flag of Czech Republic Czech Republic (30 June 1993)
* Flag of Slovakia Slovakia (30 June 1993)
* Flag of Romania Romania (7 October 1993)
* Flag of Andorra Andorra (10 October 1994)
* Flag of Latvia Latvia (10 February 1995)
* Flag of Albania Albania (13 July 1995)
* Flag of Moldova Moldova (13 July 1995)
* Flag of Republic of Macedonia Republic of Macedonia (9 November 1995)
* Flag of Ukraine Ukraine (9 November 1995)
* Flag of Russia Russia (28 February 1996)
* Flag of Croatia Croatia (6 November 1996)
* Flag of Georgia (country) Georgia (27 April 1999)
* Flag of Armenia Armenia (25 January 2001)
* Flag of Azerbaijan Azerbaijan (25 January 2001)
* Flag of Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina (24 April 2002)
* Flag of Serbia Serbia (3 April 2003)
* Flag of Monaco Monaco (5 October 2004)
Posted by: Voyager
at September 30, 2006 4:51 PM
Firstly;
I do not approve of having my articles dismissed by rude comments such as "bullshit". We reserve the right to delete or edit any comments found to be offensive and to ban commenters who are offensive.
You have been warned.
Britain like Norway was one of the first 10 nations to belong to the Council of Europe, and was involved in the setting up of the ECHR which was published in 1950.
Now, if you read the link above marked "Britain"
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/002124.html
you will see that Britain's existing existing laws are now being re-interpreted to conform to the ECHR, which they never were in 1950.
As a result of the treaties of Maastricht (forming the EU from the previous EC) and subsequent treaties, such as Nice, the conventions of ECHR are no longer gentleman's agreements, as they were originally in 1950, when ECHR came into existence.
Norway is under no such oligation as it is not subject to European Union regulations and treaties signed by EU member states.
The Council of Europe is not a legally binding body - it can only make recommendations through the European Court of Human Rights, which sits in Strasbourg and adjudicates on the European Convention on Human Rights.
EU issues are judged in the Court of Justice based at Luxembourg.
Yet for EU states, the European Convention of Human Rights (not originally from an EU institution) is now far more important than it was, say before Maastricht, as it has been incorporated into the EU constitution.
Norway is not legally obligated to follow the ECHR as are EU member states.
Posted by: Giraldus Cambrensis
at October 1, 2006 11:59 AM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)