« Pakistan: Islamic Law, Rape and Women's Rights |
| UK: Islamist Calls For Pope's Death »
September 18, 2006
UK: Islamists Make Threats At Westminster Cathedral
"Absolutely unbelievable," was my first reaction to the photographs that I saw on Joee Bloggs' site. About 100 Islamists were demonstrating on Sunday outside Westminster Cathedral, the main Catholic Church in London, holding placards saying "Curse the Pope", "Pope Benedict go to Hell," "Pope Benedict you will pay, the Mujahideen are coming your way," "Jesus Loves the Muslims," "Islam Will Conquer Rome," "Trinity of Evil: Western Crusade Against Islam."
And the police stood idly by, taking pictures, but doing absolutely nothing. Would the police stand in silence and apathy if 100 or so anti-Islamists decided to picket a mosque with threatening slogans on placards, shouting hate and contempt via microphones? Of course not.
This is the failing of Britain's society. The police do not wish to inflame tensions, and thus allow people to behave outrageously with impunity. Every single one of the people outside the cathedral was participating in an illegal, unauthorised demonstration.
A demonstration that took place in the center of London. And did the media show any interest? Of course not. After all, it is only Christians being vilified by hate-filled Islamists, who are always seen as "victims". The BBC could easily have sent a few cameramen around to record the disgraceful episode. But the BBC is spending too much time documenting how "outraged", "hurt" or "offended" the "poor Muslims" are, by a speech most Muslims are too ignorant and lazy to have read.
All I can do is extend my praise and gratitude to Joee Bloggs, and ask you to visit the site and see the pictures for yourself. And to imagine how Muslims would react if, on a Friday evening, during their special Juma prayers, hordes of angry non-Muslims hurled abuse at Mohammed.
These bastards do not belong in civilised society. Before I rupture a blood vessel, please visit Joee Bloggs' website Catholic Londoner and see for yourself.
There seems to be a lot of similarity with the individuals from Al Ghurabaa who organised the hateful demonstrations outside the Danish Embassy on February 3. Al Ghurabaa is banned, but its vicious and ignorant followers are still walking free.
Congratulations, Joee Bloggs, for taking those photographs and letting the world see what sort of godless monsters are dwelling in our midst.
Posted by Giraldus Cambrensis at September 18, 2006 12:00 AM
Comments
The key term here is that the police were taking photographs. Let them have their day, we will now monitor them, find out where they go, who they contact and we will build a bigger picture in order to catch the really big fish.
Posted by: Michael_R ![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.westernresistance.com/nav-commenters.gif)
at September 18, 2006 3:16 AM
Police photographs? Most of the demonstrators were fully masked - just like that other peaceful organisation, the Ku Klux Klan.
Posted by: Prodicus at September 18, 2006 8:03 AM
This is a must read. An excerpt below
Apologize for what?
The BBC appears to have been quickest off the mark, to send around the world in many languages, including Arabic, Turkish, Farsi, Urdu, and Malay, word that the Pope had insulted the Prophet of Islam, during an address in Bavaria.
He had not, of course. Pope Benedict XVI had instead quoted, carefully and without approval, remarks by the learned 14th-century Byzantine emperor, Manuel II Palaeologus, in debate with a 14th-century learned Persian. He was trying to provide a little historical depth to present controversies about the meaning of "jihad", and his very point was that on their own respective theological terms, Muslims and Christians were bound to talk past each other today, in the same ways as they did seven centuries ago. But in the most conscientious media reports I have seen, even the Byzantine emperor is quoted out of context.
....
By turning the story back-to-front, so that what�s promised in the lead -- a crude attack on Islam -- is quietly withdrawn much later in the text, the BBC journalists were having a little mischief. The kind of mischief that is likely to end with Catholic priests and faithful butchered around the Muslim world. Either the writers were so jaw-droppingly ignorant, they did not realize this is what they were abetting (always a possibility with the postmodern journalist), or the malice was intended. There is no third possibility.
From the start, the BBC�s reports said the Pope would �face criticism from Muslim leaders� -- in the present tense. This is a form of dishonesty that has become common in journalism today. The flagrantly biased reporter, feigning objectivity, spices his story by just guessing what a man�s enemies will say, even before they have spoken.
http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/
Posted by: DP111 at September 18, 2006 7:39 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)