Western Resistance

I can only repeat what I posted a couple of weeks ago at another site.

Many people have put a lot of effort and thought into their blogs, in an attempt to help stem the onslaught of Islam.

However, it occurs to me that this method of trying to check the menace of Islam is akin to trying to cure smallpox by cleaning up the thousands of individual puss spots on the body of an infected person. In other words, you are just treating the symptoms of the disease, not the disease itself. One has to tackle the causal factors, the virus itself!

In a harsher world, as with cases of the Asian Flu virus, whole populations of poultry have been were slaughtered (a popular Muslim word!) to prevent the infection from spreading to other populations.

Such a "root and branch" method has not been, and cannot be, applied to infected humans. In any case, it is not something that can be condoned since we are talking of about 1.2 billion persons infected with this Islamic virus!

Taking a purely medical approach, it is necessary to see how the infection presents itself. A close examination of the patients show that:

1. they are born into a closed, almost incestuous, society.

2. they learn the concepts of Islam from a very early age and their sense of right and wrong is shaped by the closed society they live in.

3. by the time they reach puberty, it has become their way of life, something they take for granted, something they do not question. Or even dare to question since, by this time, they have also learnt that to question anything about their religion takes them into the dangerous well-charted waters of apostasy.

4. when they attend their ritual Friday prayers, these concepts and value-systems are reinforced, forcefully and regularly, by imams or prayer leaders at their mosques.

5. they completely have integrated the 'them" and "us" mindset, an entrenched point of view that they refuse to even question.

6. even in the adult state, they remain within their closed society, restricting interactions with non-islamic non-infected persons only on a needs must basis.

The root of the infection is their unshakable and deeply entrenched belief that the Koran is a perfect document (a very palpable untruth), and their faith that Mohammed, their Prophet (though, judging by his behaviour, Profiteer might have be a more appropriate word), was a true messenger of the god.

There is no simple or short-term remedy. To contain this exceedingly virulent virus, to make its progress untenable, we need to examine these factors and systematically dismantle the pillars of Islam.

In terms of history, there is ample evidence to substantiate the presence of Israel, and the chronology of the Jewish and Christian faiths. There is, however, very little archaeological evidence to sustain the presence of Mohammed, that 7th Century pillar of Islam.

I might be mistaken, but the first reference appears to have surfaced only in the 9th or 10th Century!

Similarly, despite much evidence of existing trade routes in that region during, and before, that period, there is little or no reference to Mecca as a vital trade centre. Further, the etymology of the word "ka'aba", which predates Islam, seems to suggest that such a pilgrimage centre did not exist ONLY in Mecca. that many other such centres existed throughout the region to serve other non-muslim populations.

Their imbecilic argument that the Koran is immutable because it was written by god needs to be demolished. Its inaccuracies and deficiencies must be highlighted, and the miserable knowledge-base of such a "god" be brought into scorn.

This cannot be done quickly. A war of attrition might have to be sustained over a long period to attack the younger and future generations.

The carpet, literally, has to be pulled from under them. Their "faith" needs to be slowly demolished by a detailed look at the following items:

* Mohammed, and all his followers, were, for the most part illiterate

* the passages from the Koran were passed on as an oral tradition, which, probably, gave rise to the current interest in having people memorise the entire Koran

* not all the passages in the Koran, in its entirety, were known to all of Mohammed's followers

* at times, even Mohammed seemed uncertain of his memory of certain passages

* some of these passages were written down in the local language, not in Arabic

* the evolution of the Arabic script during the critical 7th Century period when the Koran was first "written" and when it was finally codified, sometime in the 10th Century

* several versions of the Koran existed until it was decided that only one should be kept, and the rest were destroyed

* the earliest extant version of the Koran manuscript, found in the Yemen, should be closely examined archaeologists and language scholars to help get a fix on the Koran as it was, and what it has become today.

The patient does not require just medication. Radical deep surgery is called for!

Dear aviceda

Truer words have never been spoken, Islam, and Islam alone is the problem here. The terrorists are not aberrant Muslims, they are devout followers of Koran and Hadith.

I noticed in today's print edition of the Telegraph that Mahmood Hussain, Hasib's father, is a "devout" Muslim, who wears a semi-clerical robe (like a long nightshirt) and wears the obligatory white cap.

The devout parents have helped all four of the London 7/7 bombers to adopt a literalist interpretation of their "faith".

Even the "convert", Jermaine Lindsay, who was born in Jamaica, had a mother who converted to Islam in 2000 and then started to disguise herself as a tent.

The MSM needs to get it into their heads - liberal Islam is the heresy, not fundamentalist Islam.

Best regards

Giraldus

Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

URL:
Remember me? YesNo

Comments: