« Indonesia: Trial of Five Suspected JI Islamists |
| Iran: Russia's Nuclear Fuel Offer Rejected »
January 2, 2006
UK: Political Correctness Crumbles When Discussing Gays and Islam
In politically correct Britain, it is a given that all the minorities being patronised by those who espouse PCism should get along. I lived in Hackney, east London from 1976 to 1998, and I personally witnessed Asian men who thought of blacks as "scum", heard black kids laughing and celebrating when our local Asian post office owner was murdered, and heard blacks and other minorities refer to gays and lesbians in virtually medieval terms.
Now this sad truth, that not all minorities behave the way one would want, when they are indulgently patronised by bleeding-heart middle-class lefties with consciences, has been exposed, and various individuals are now getting angst-ridden.
The group to cause such consternation among the champagne socialists is the Gay and Lesbian Humanist Association (Galha), who, believe it or not, DO NOT LIKE ISLAM.
Perhaps the Sharia customs of throwing homosexuals off cliffs, stoning them to death, hanging them or bulldozing walls on top of them, all practiced by the Islamist regime in Iran, have led gay people to realise that fundamentalist Muslims can be nothing other than the "enemy", no matter how many times the f*ckwits on the left blandly lump them together with other "deserving minorities", including Muslims.
The magazine of Galha, which I had never heard of, has produced an article which said that Islam is growing "like a canker" in the UK through "unrestrained and irresponsible breeding." If this categorisation includes "unrestrained and irresponsible" marrying of arranged partners from some Islamoparadise such as Pakistan or Bangladesh, then I have to say I agree.
The Guardian states that the magazine also published an article supporting the views of Dutch (gay) politician Pim Fortuyn, and described immigrants as "ill educated and culturally estranged Third Worlders".
The Race Hate Crime Forum chairman, a man called Peter Herbert, has now announced he will be writing to the Crown Prosecution Service about the remarks, and would be seeking a prosecution.
Some of Galha's luminaries have expressed concern about the comments on immigrants and immigration, as they could be seen as "racist" but have stuck by their guns over the issue of Islam.
George Broadhead, secretary of Galha, has written: "What is wrong with being fearful of Islam? (There is a lot to fear) ... What does a moderate Muslim do, other than excuse the real nutters by adhering to this barmy doctrine?"
Well? What's so wrong with that? Islam is worse than barmy - it is dangerous, and totally incompatible with Western democratic values.
Maybe it is time these cafe latte socialist wankers realised that, just because they themselves compartmentalise all minorities into one easily-identified "group", does not mean all minorities are the same, or think the same way. I found this out through 20 years of living and working with "minorities". How come it takes the PC brigade so long to discover this plain fact?
But politically-motivated minorites always know how to play the "victim" card. I suggest Galha devotes some of its column inches to condemning Peter Herbert as a "homophobe". He may not be a genuine homophobe, but he will find in practice that, once accused, it can be bloody hard to prove otherwise in our PC climate.
Posted by Giraldus Cambrensis at January 2, 2006 11:53 AM
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)